View in context

Table 4.24. Vessel form frequencies for White Mountain Red Ware types.a
Ceramic Type Present Project Jones Ranch Road Projectb
Bowls Jars Other Total Bowls Jars Other Total
*Puerco B/R No. 151 9 0 160 76 32 0 108
Row % 94.38 5.63 - 100.0 70.37 29.63 -
Col. % 25.38 16.67 - 24.50
*Wingate B/R No. 104 7 0 111 298 36 0 334
Row % 93.69 6.31 - 100.0 89.22 11.68 - 100.0
Col. % 17.48 12.96 - 17.00
*Wingate Polychrome No. 14 0 0 14 145 0 0 145
Row % 100.0 - - 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0
Col. % 2.35 - - 2.14
*St. Johns B/R No. 61 1 0 62 20 0 0 20
Row % 98.39 1.61 - 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0
Col. % 10.25 1.85 - 9.49
*St. Johns Polychrome No. 9 1 1 10 66 0 0 66
Row % 90.00 10.00 - 100.0 100.0 - - 100.0
Col. % 1.51 1.85 - 1.53
Uniden. White Mountain Red Ware B/R No. 255 33 4 292
Row % 87.33 11.30 1.37 100.0
Col. % 42.86 61.11 100.0 44.72
Uniden. White Mountain Red Ware Polychrome No. 1 3 0 4
Row % 25.00 75.00 - 100.0
Col. % 0.17 5.56 - 0.61
TOTAL No. 595 54 4 653 605 68 0 673
Row % 91.12 8.27 0.61 100.0 89.90 10.10 - 100.0
Col. % 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
aChi-square calculated on bowls versus jars of identified (starred*) types only=3.264, df=4, prob=0.5147, and Cramer’s V=0.096. Table may be too sparse for Chi-square to be a valid test.
bData from Robertson et al. (1983:Appendix F, Table F.1), totaled for all nine excavated sites.